Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Wilson's avatar

A number of women commenters have pointed out how society accepts 'heightened boldness' more in men than women. They are not wrong.

As a generalisation, women have historically been socialised not to claim their competence - ‘don’t scare the boys away’. As a result, women often won’t apply for a role unless they believe they can do everything in the job description, whereas men are willing to put themselves forwards if they think they can do most of it and handwave the rest.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/05/the-confidence-gap/359815/

When I was talking to Hayden, I'd been tempted to say con-persons but criminologically speaking, con artists are overwhelmingly male. Women commit different types of white-collar crime – largely embezzling and ‘quiet fraud’ and far less in-person cons and scams and ‘brazen fraud’. https://www.statista.com/statistics/461354/distribution-of-perpetrators-of-fraud-cases-by-gender/

Of course, maybe some of this can be attributed to a social halo effect – that we assume women are less likely to be criminal which isn’t necessarily true as evidenced by Elizabeth Holmes. https://www.wpr.org/long-history-long-cons-and-shorter-ones-committed-female-con-artists

As an aside, others have noted that entrepreneurs and con-men seem to have quite a bit in common, psychologically speaking. Maybe some entrepreneurs start legit and then when things don’t pan out – slide onto the other side of the ledger.

https://www.inc.com/magazine/201306/alexander-stein/entrepreneurs-and-con-men-have-in-common.html

Expand full comment
Plague Craig's avatar

You got me. The whole time I was thinking about what must have happened during takeoff, and how he knew where the autopilot controls were...

Expand full comment
95 more comments...

No posts