I Hope I Never Send This Webworm
“I’m going to use a high-falutin legal term here: I am freaked out.”
Hi,
I’ve been imagining a scenario where I am walking along the pavement in the United States. It’s dusk, I am off to get a giant dripping burrito from my favourite place, and I see three men in hoodies approaching.
Anther two men appear from around a corner, and this whole thing feels bad, and I realise I have about 3-5 seconds to communicate what’s happening to my readers, friends and loved ones before someone grabs my hands, yanks my phone away, and throws me in the back of a van.
If this was a few years ago, I’d probably text a friend or send a tweet. Today, I realise that’s too slow. And so in the backend of Webworm, I have created a draft and created a shortcut to that draft, so in about 3-5 seconds I am pretty confident I can blast out an email with this subject line:
Assuming my fingers move fast enough, it goes to you, which means it also goes to my family and my friends and my lawyer. I guess this will be the one newsletter that’s a true test of who in my life reads this fucking thing.
“Stop being so dramatic David, you’re white, you’re fine,” I hear you say. I hear myself say it, too. I’ve been saying it to myself again and again. I get it.
Stick with me.
Back on March 20th, I briefly touched on how unusual it is to be doing any kind of journalism in the US right now — citing the case of Mahmoud Khalil, who’s sitting in an immigration jail in Louisiana.
Since then, things have gotten much worse. We have a string of cases of people legally residing in the US on visas and green cards being kidnapped in the street, grabbed by men in hoodies and thrown into unmarked SUVS.
Their “crimes” mostly involve talking out about Palestine.
30-year-old Rümeysa Öztürk (in the United States legally) was making her way to meet her friends for dinner, when six officers jumped her, refusing to show any identification until she was trapped. It’s terrifying footage to watch, and begs the question of what you’re meant to do when you see a woman being bundled into a van in America.
If you’re Johns Hopkins University, you put out a memo saying you should never intervene. Let them be taken.
It instructs employees not to obstruct the officers’ activities or block their movement in any facility. Additionally, employees are instructed not to notify the person who is being sought by federal law enforcement officials.
On Tuesday, the weekly podcast I make focussed on this string of deportations. We discussed my history of writing a lot of negative things about Donald Trump and Elon Musk, and my very clear thoughts on the genocide in Gaza
a) Existing
b) Being very, very bad.
My producer Rob questioned whether doing this episode was a good idea (it goes pretty widely these days, which is nice, but also a bit scary). He was being protective of me, essentially asking if I was shooting myself in the foot, creating an excess risk of being detained myself when leaving and entering the United States for work.
My answer was — if that happens, so be it. That’s absolutely not a reason to shut up. I am glad we had the conversation — and I am glad we aired the episode.
Some people liked it. Others didn’t.
But before we get too dramatic about this, back to my initial point: I am deeply aware that I am a privileged white man — a sort of get-out-of-jail free card for the last few thousand years or so.
So this morning I called Greg Lukianoff, the president of FIRE (the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) who was in Washington, DC.
FIRE is a First Amendment legal advocacy group that’s been involved in Mahmoud Khalil’s case at Columbia, and also just successfully represented a student group for its right to produce a drag show in Texas.
I opened by telling Greg a little about my work here on Webworm, before saying: “It’s a bit of a unique time to be here on a Visa — but I am white, so I’m probably fine.”
“I wouldn’t count on that,” he replied. “I’m going to use a high-falutin legal term here: I am freaked out.”
And when he said “I”, he was kinda referring to himself. He went on:
One of the things that I think a lot of people don’t quite get is how serious the attack on law firms are, and how bizarre the justifications are — and some of the powers that Trump is using in executive orders.
He [Trump] is going after, overwhelmingly, law firms that participated in what they call “lawfare” against Trump. They’re going after some of the [lawyers] who were involved in some of January 6 prosecutions and some of the attempts to get the 2020 election overturned.
It’s unprecedented to have a President punishing a law firm with threats of removing your security clearance, which makes it essentially impossible for a lot of lawyers in DC to actually do their jobs, but even more troublingly your ability to enter federal buildings — which of course, includes courts.
And I really want to pause on that.
Some of the stuff that they’re going after originally was like going after the people who went after Trump for a variety of offenses.
But they even have extended to using the justification of saying, “You opposed us in court on affirmative action” and it’s like: “So wait, you’re saying that law firms that opposed your administration’s policies can’t enter court unless they either pay you a tonne of money, or agree to give you hundreds of millions of dollars of pro bono work?”
And here’s an important thing, too: We’re in court against Trump right now. And we’re just a medium-sized nonprofit. And we’re like, “Wow, when is our turn coming up?”
From there, I asked him about Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil.

Mahmoud Khalil was arrested — and they tried to immediately get him to Louisiana, which is a more favorable legal forum where the Trump administration thinks it can get away with anything.
And when it first happened, I was like, “Oh man, are they going to say he was involved in some actual criminal behavior?” And when they started having press conferences about it, they were citing flyers.
First of all… you’re not even saying he handed these out?! Like, this guy [Khalil] was actually someone who the administration even trusted enough that he was a negotiator with the students.
And there was a little bit of like, “Okay, well you certainly can’t kick him out just for being roughly in proximity to flyers, that’s ridiculous. But maybe something worse will come out at some point.”
Nothing worse has come out.
So this case is one of those ones that just seems to get more and more troubling. And here’s the thing: Even if you don’t care about Khalil, even if you don’t like the pro-Palestinian protesters, I want to caution everybody here because the power that the Government is using is this provision that gives the Secretary of State personal authority to kick you out of the country — even if you're even if you’re on a green card — if you are found to have “an adverse effect on foreign policy.”
First of all, the idea Khalil is creating some kind of international incident for us is ridiculous — but also it’s this vast power.
And here's the punchline.
This policy has been challenged exactly once in court. And it was ruled to be unconstitutional on its face (because it gave the Secretary of State too much power) by Trump’s sister!
She’s a departed judge, she died a couple of years ago, but Trump’s sister found this to be ridiculous — that this was way too much for the Secretary of State to have.
So it is even worse than I had feared. And that brings me to the Tufts [Rümeysa Öztürk] case. Like, the only thing that to our knowledge they have on this young woman is that she wrote an op-ed, saying that Tuft should divest from Israel.
Now there’s going to be a hearing soon. Maybe they’ll reveal that, you know, she tried to blow up the sun or something. But so far all we know is that it’s based on an op-ed.
An excellent op-ed you should read, by the way, as Rümeysa Öztürk sits in ICE custody in Louisiana awaiting trial.
Towards the end of my conversation with Greg, I went back to my original, selfish point: Me. The main character in my own fumbling, weird life.
“For someone like me who is pretty white and privileged and spouts off on the internet all the time,” I said, “How worried should I be coming in and out of the United States? Should I be deleting my social media apps, or are the chances of anything happening just so low? Like, who gives a shit about me?”
He paused.
Well, first of all, the idea that being white or privileged is going to protect you in this is, I think, misguided.
And I think that there is real reason to worry. But if you need help, you definitely let FIRE know. We’re not immigration lawyers, but we’re having to brush up a lot on that lately.
And I think that everybody should be worried. I mean, I’m going to — this sounds like a not so humble brag —I’m going to Vancouver next week to give a Ted Talk, and there are a couple of people I'm speaking with who are also here on green cards, who are quite critical of the government — and they’re a little they’re all a little spooked. And I’d like to say, “Oh, that's ridiculous.”
But I can’t really say that.
I am in the US right now for a few key reasons:
I am deeply curious and horrified by what’s going on, and I want to witness and document things first hand. Not to be too pretentious or worthy, I think that’s part of my job, and right now — with no dependents — I feel I am well placed to do that.
Friends that I love.
I find a slight step of distance good when writing about certain New Zealand topics — the Arise church stuff, Zuru, gurus.
I have other work here I enjoy. I like making Flightless Bird. I am excited about doing live shows in places like San Francisco and Portland soon. For those screaming at me about Dark Tourist Season 2 (not happening) I have some documentary and TV ideas I’m fumbling away at (it never gets easier, it’s always hard, but you’ve got to at least try).
The squirrels, the raccoons, the opossums.
And if something I write passionately about sees me thrown into the back of a van, so be it. I just hope I fumble a few swipes and taps in time to send this:
Instantly, you’ll know what’s going on, and I guess the lawyer who helps me from time to time gets to work, and maybe they’ll reach out to FIRE who I’m now (gratefully) in touch with. The company that powers this newsletter has a relationship with them, too.
Eventually, I’d end up back in New Zealand, unable to return to this weird fuckin’ place.
A place Greg described like this:
You know, it’s one of these things where as an advocate you want to stay measured, particularly when you know things potentially could get worse — because you don't want to say, “This is the worst day in history,” and then the next day say it’s even worse.
But it’s bad.
When you look at the totality of things that the Trump administration is trying to pull off, it’s very concerning.
I’m in DC right now, and it’s worrisome. And I think it’s going to get worse.
David.
Greg Lukianoff co-authored The Coddling of the American Mind with Jonathan Haidt in 2018, and his latest — The Canceling of the American Mind — is out April 29.
I was talking to a friend yesterday who has to go to US for their child's graduation. A person of colour who has done a lot of work in DEI. They are so scared but don't want to let their child down.
So we discussed safety plans. Get a burner phone. Don't take your laptop, buy a second hand iPad/device or borrow one. Leave it behind when you leave. Go through social media and delete posts that might get you in trouble. Etc etc.
I'm not a security expert but I feel that people need a full security plan before they leave. As a Muslim women whose main work is on belonging and inclusion, I wouldn't dare travel to the US at the moment. And I've been 4 times since 2019.
I think you are right to be freaked out.
The ICE detentions have been on my mind too.
I run a committee that selects students to spend the last two years of high school at a set of 18 international schools around the world - United World Colleges (UWC) - alongside students from around the world selected by other committees like mine. Most students attend with significant or full scholarships.
In 2000 a US billionaire, Shelby Davis, established the world's largest private scholarship programme. It exclusively funds UWC students to attend US universities. Consequently, a lot of my committee's alumni go on to study in the US.
This is the email I sent last week to my committee's graduating students:
Kia ora UWC Aotearoa NZ class of 2025.
...
I know that with Davis and other scholarships, the USA has been an attractive post-UWC study destination. UWC has often held up Davis scholarships as one of the benefits of attending UWC. For that reason, I feel I have a duty of pastoral care to offer the following advice.
If you are planning to study in the USA, my first advice is to look elsewhere. The USA is no longer a safe travel destination for anyone not born there (and potentially, in future, even some who were, if their parents were not US citizens at the time of their birth - the US President wants to remove/revoke birthright citizenship). The risk is higher still for those of you who are not 'white'; and there is a separate additional set of risks if you have a uterus. [_I would have included an additional point on risks for trans people if it had applied to any of this year's graduands_].
I recommend visiting https://www.uwc.org/educationalpartners to see some universities outside the USA that have UWC-specific programmes or funding.
If you do decide to go ahead with US study plans, my key second piece of advice is to have a set of backup plans.
Your plans should include the following:
1. What is your plan if your US visa application is refused?
- N.B. before applying, scrub your social media. Visas are being refused even for 'liking' posts that criticise the current regime, or showing/liking any political position inconsistent with current regime views. See https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/28/student-visa-applications-denials
- Ask your school university advisor if they will be able to support you after you've left UWC, in case your US study plans become non-viable.
2. What is your plan if you are refused entry at the border?
- N.B. Before travelling, as well as the aforementioned social media scrub:
-- delete any stored information on your phone that could even vaguely be viewed as opposed to the regime.
-- Delete your browser history.
-- Delete all cookies so that opening your browser will not automatically open your emails.
-- Scrub your message history.
-- Let any friends/family in/from countries out of favour with the regime know you will need to unfriend/unfollow them before travel.
-- Set up Signal for communication, but delete the app prior to travel (reinstall after arrival). You can reach me on [number]
-- Delete this email.
-- See https://www.wired.com/2017/02/guide-getting-past-customs-digital-privacy-intact/
-- Have an alternative study or gap year plan to fall back on.
3. What is your plan if you are detained at the border?
- Ensure you memorise at least one phone number of a US-born 'safe' US citizen you trust, who will be awake at the time you arrive in the USA. Tell them your travel plans. It is possible you may only get one phone call, after your phone has already been removed. It is also possible you will get no phone call at all. Make sure your friends and family know the website for tracking people detained by ICE (https://locator.ice.gov/odls/#/search)
4. What is your backup plan if you are detained while in the USA?
- N.B. Do not involve yourself in any political/protest activity while in the USA. (I hate having to say this. UWC students should be standing up and speaking out. However, it is not currently safe to do so in the USA, and particularly not safe for non-citizens)
5. What is your backup plan if you are deported partway through your studies?
- Have in mind a suitable university/course, and familiarise yourself with the transfer process.
6. What is your plan for reducing risk?
- See point 4 on non-involvement in politics/protest
- Note that every engagement with border authorities is a high risk engagement. The safest plan (after 'not going at all') would mean staying in the USA for the full duration of your studies.
7. If you have a uterus, I would strongly advise checking the reproductive healthcare policies of the State where you are planning to study. In many states, if you have a pregnancy, planned or unplanned, even if you _want_ to carry the pregnancy to term, you risk your fertility and even your life if something goes wrong; and doctors may be legally unable to provide life-saving treatment if doing so would endanger the life of the foetus, even if you would _both_ die without that treatment. See https://https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/jul/29/abortion-laws-bans-by-state for where things stood a month ago. Stick to the States coloured 'Legal'.
Your school university advisor should be available to discuss non-USA options.
Do please let me know if you need support.
Kia kaha, arohanui,