Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jackson's avatar

One of the things which always gets me, and it's in Art's comments, is the fatal misunderstanding of a) the economic system in which we are all forced to slave under and b) the scientific method.

a) Science didn't say fat was bad. Marketers for a company (which makes money presumably off selling sugar, artificial sweetners, butter-subsitutes, etc) said fat was bad, a company paid "scientists" and influencers to say fat was bad. The problem is not "science", the problem is rich people wanting to be slightly richer at the expense of the health and wellbeing of poorer people and who are comfortable with disregarding facts and literally killing people to make this happen.

The problem is that because of this unequal distribution of wealth, it makes it desirable and necessary for some people who should know better, to become mouthpieces for rich people to spread their terrible ideas.

b) Science is a system of discovering and disseminating information, it doesn't tell anyone anything ever. Sometimes you can, through the scientific method, get to a point where you can make reasonable predictions about certain things. But many of the things we research scrape the surface a problem or topic. No scientist worth their atomic mass is going to write in a peer reviewed paper "Welp, that's the end of it: solved.". They always always acknowledge that more and ongoing research is needed to test the conclusions. We *should* act on what growing bodies of scientific evidence tell us to do. The world would be a better place if we did, butttttt... as per point a), the tentacles of the rich who want to be richer, push of marketing campaigns and media stories. Hence why every week there's a story about why alcohol is good for you, a new cure for cancer, ten top tips on whatever, and why people tend to trust scientists and people using evidence less and less.

In some peoples minds they cannot, or will not, split the transparent and open method of science from the perverted PR that capitalism demands. It is hard. Which is also why the "do your own research" line is so troubling. Through capitalism, you can easily game the search results, pay Influencers to say nice things about your cyanide-based lip balm, create so much noise that people don't know what is true and so therefore reach for what is easy and comforting.

TL;DR: SMASH CAPTIALISM, EAT INFLUENCERS

Shit. Influencers are a product of this digital hyper-capitalism. They're lackies of the rich elite braying for scraps at theitable and posting their perfectly whitened teeth glinting in their shit-stained grins.

Expand full comment
Ryan Lithgow's avatar

I'm guessing that this kind of "science is a journey" kind of thinking leads to people microwaving library books in an attempt to disinfect them.

Thanks to the person who wrote about David Icke's "chewing gum theory", I wanted to have a bit of a read about it but instead found myself reading Jon Ronson articles and them one of his books "The psychopath test" which in one of it's chapters goes into the denial and mania around the 7/7 bombing attacks in London. One of the leading figures in the 7/7 conspiracy group David Shayler ends up claiming to become the new incarnation of the christian messiah.

These worm holes are fun, thank you David and friends.

Expand full comment
56 more comments...

No posts